ShareThis Page

Union Township audit to be unveiled Monday

| Tuesday, April 12, 2005

UNION TOWNSHIP - The long anticipated audit of the township's 2004 finances is completed.

And the figures will be announced at a special meeting 7 p.m. Monday.

At last night's regular monthly meeting of the township supervisors, Chairman Steve Parish announced that the audit conducted by the firm of Cypher and Cypher was complete and that the first open date the company was available to release the report was April 18.

So the board unanimously approved the special session to give the auditors a chance to report their findings.

Coincidentally, the supervisors will meet the following night with the state Department of Community Economic Development, which also wants to look at the 2004 audit.

Meanwhile, the township's sagging financial situation was laid out again Monday night by township secretary/treasurer Monica Cunningham, who reported that the township has $90,068 in unpaid bills.

That total does not include other township liabilities, such as monies owed to laid-off police officers as well as working officers and another $44,000 that must be paid back to a salt fund by the end of July.

Compounding the township's financial woes is that the general fund only has $57,945.

Parish noted that the next two payrolls coming up will eat approximately $44,000 of that balance.

"The next two payrolls are going to drain (the general fund) out," Parish said.

The supervisors approved paying bills totaling over $29,000 "as funds are available."

When Parish criticized the way township finances were handled in 2004 by saying he was never allowed to see any records, a member of the audience noted that Parish was a member of the board in 2004.

The chairman responded by saying all township records are public and should have never been held back from anyone to look at and inspect.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me