ShareThis Page

Arrests follow traffic stop in Donora

| Tuesday, April 26, 2005

DONORA - Three people were arrested on drug charges following a routine traffic stop 6:08 p.m. Sunday.

Mark Yarbrough Sr., 38, of Washington, Pa., was charged with possession of drug paraphernalia, possession of a small amount of marijuana, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, former convict not to carry a firearm, and firearms not to be carried without a license.

Yarbrough, a former Donora resident, became belligerent during the traffic stop and yelled obscenities at the officers.

Police also arrested passengers Jamilla Gallmore, 27, of Donora, and Diana Gallo, 20, of Washington, Pa.

Gallmore told police officers Brett Massafra and Jason Paternoster that her name was Setia Valentine. However, one of the officers knew her true identity.

Gallmore was charged with possession of a controlled substance (suspected cocaine), possession of a small amount of marijuana, tampering with physical evidence, and false identification to law enforcement.

Gallo was charged with possession of a small amount of marijuana and disorderly conduct.

Police said a .357-caliber Magnum handgun was also allegedly found under the front driver's seat, along with bullets. Police found a drug scale in the vehicle.

They were all arraigned before Magisterial District Justice Jay Weller, of South Strabane Township, and remanded to the Washington County Correctional Facility. Yarbrough's bond was set at $5,000 straight cash; Gallmore's, $3,000 straight cash; and Gallo's, $1,000 straight cash, police said.

Donora Police Superintendent Jim Brice said that when officers requested assistance, police from Monessen, Rostraver Township, North Belle Vernon, Monongahela, Carroll Township and Charleroi responded. Four state police vehicles also responded.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me