ShareThis Page
News

Rochester blasts Cal, 42-7

| Saturday, Nov. 6, 2010

ROCHESTER — The Rochester Rams are considered the second best team in WPIAL's Class A behind Clairton.

California found out why Friday night.

The unbeaten Rams (10-0) did all their scoring in the opening 24 minutes in a 42-7 romp over the visiting Trojans (6-4).

"They're a very good team and it's a shame we didn't have a better showing against them," said second-year California coach Brady Barbero.

T.D. Conway, California's 1,000-yard passer, had to take a back seat to Rams' quarterback Jason Adamson.

While Conway was completing 12 of 29 passes for 112 yards and a 5-yard touchdown pass to older brother Dakota Conway in the fourth quarter, Adamson was a perfect six-for-six for 160 yards and three touchdowns in the first half.

Rochester led 19-0 in the first quarter on Adamson's 29-yard touchdown pass to Troy Belcastro, followed by touchdown runs of 45 yards by De'Andre Moon and 2 yards by Devon Glass.

In the second quarter Adamson threw touchdown passes of 45 and 9 yards to Kaylon Kenney after Glass' 11-yard touchdown run to put the 35-point mercy rule into effect.

California managed only one first down in the opening half.

Rochester will face Beth-Center, a 34-12 winner over Cornell in the quarterfinals.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me