ShareThis Page

Oakmont Planning Commission approved developing part of the former Edgewater Steel site

| Monday, Jan. 1, 2007

Oakmont Planning Commission approved its final recommendation for Kacin Companies, developers of half of the former Edgewater Steel site, to be submitted to Oakmont Borough Council for approval.

The planning commission recommended that borough council accept modifications on lot depth and rear yard setback, but said density still needed work.

Kacin architects and commission members disagreed on site density preferences. The commission said some areas were too tight, with a large quantity of buildings crammed into small spaces. The west and north areas are consistent with the borough's mixed-use zoning ordinance, but the south and southeast areas exceed the borough's definition of an acceptable density.

The streets need to remain suburban rather than urban, said Jeff Kline, commission member.

Kacin Vice-President Bruce Corna said architects designed the project with potential buyers in mind. He said removing units would make the price of others go up.

"We've tried to work to make this a livable community," he said, referring to the off-site sports fields Kacin Companies plans to provide. "I think we've done everything we can to accommodate what you're trying to do."

The planning commission will submit its recommendations to Oakmont Council, which will then be discussed and eventually voted on at future meetings.

The planning commission asked PNC planners to consider contributing to the cost of building and maintaining the traffic light planned for Allegheny River Boulevard and Allegheny Avenue at their intersections with Hulton Road.

The traffic signals will be paid for primarily by Walgreens, which recently opened next to the site of the proposed PNC branch.

If PNC contributes, borough manager Roger Dunlap said the borough would consider waiving a traffic study requirement.

The planning commission also said it was concerned with the amount of pavement surrounding the building.

Members asked PNC planners to consider reducing the number of parking spaces.

PNC planners said the parking spaces are necessary because employees will take up as many as nine spaces, and one handicapped spot is required, leaving fewer for customers.

The planning commission said green space is essential, and a sea of asphalt is not aesthetically pleasing.

Planning commission members said the elimination of three spaces would be sufficient and will recommend it to council.

The planning commission will meet again Wednesday, Jan. 17.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me