ShareThis Page
News

Extra cameras considered for Plum High School

| Saturday, Aug. 1, 2009

The Plum school board wants to beef up camera surveillance at the high school.

The board voted 8-1 last week to advertise for bids for the cameras, with member Linda Eazor dissenting.

Eazor questioned the need for eight more cameras that would bring the total number at the high school to 32.

"When I look at the disciplinary reports on our students, I don't think they warrant this kind of 'gotcha technology,' " Eazor said. "I am struggling with that — to rationalize the 'God forbid' reasoning. I'm not a fan of spending $4,000 on cameras."

Eazor said she would rather see the district spend $4,000 on "educating students on the legal consequences of sexting."

High School Principal Ryan Kociela said the need for additional cameras was determined after he, school resource Officer Mark Kost, who is a Plum police officer, and Jeff Wolfe, the director of student activities and the assistant athletic director walked through the high school and found areas not covered by the district's current camera system.

Kociela said four of the additional cameras would be placed on the ground floor near the fitness center and print shop. Also, one would be installed at the auditorium entrance, adding a second camera at that location; adding a third in the cafeteria, in the food-line area of the kitchen and on the loading dock.

Kociela added that security cameras are not the primary form of student management, but they "help govern student behavior in the hallways."

Eazor didn't find much support among other school board members for her view of the cameras.

The only other concern was with finances.

Board member Dawn Caruso isn't happy that the possible expenditure is not in the budget.

"I am in support of being proactive," Caruso said. "But I am concerned about it being unbudgeted. No state budget has been passed, so we don't know how much we will get from the state."

Board member Kevin Dowdell who supported advertising for more cameras, said the system frees up teachers for educational activities.

"It's more effective if teachers are preparing for their next class rather than monitoring the hallways," Dowdell said.

Eazor said the district should not limit its concentration of cameras to the high school.

"Why aren't they (cameras) in the other schools?" Eazor asked. "The incidents we're trying to prevent don't just happen at the high school.

When is it enough in feeling safe• There has to be a balance."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me