ShareThis Page

2 wins equals no tax collector for East Vandergrift

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Tuesday, Dec. 29, 2009

The borough is searching for someone to serve as tax collector after the person who won election in November resigned.

Borough Councilwoman Susan Stanczak, 54, won a four-year term in November, when she was the only candidate, receiving 116 votes.

The former longtime tax collector, Allen Urban, did not seek re-election.

But Stanczak, a Democrat who was appointed to council three years ago, also won election to council, coming in fourth in the race for four seats.

Stanczak said that, before the election, she and other officials believed she could hold both offices. They found out later that she can't.

"I do feel bad about it," she said. "I would like to have done both if I could. I was under the impression I could. We found out after the election I'm not able to do that."

Stanczak said she chose to remain on council rather than claim the tax collector's office because of the work she has already done on council.

The borough is accepting applications to fill the vacant tax collector's position until Jan. 4, when a person will be appointed at the council's reorganization meeting.

The person appointed would serve until the next municipal election in 2011, county elections Director Jim Montini said.

The Kiski Area School District would likely use the same tax collector as the borough, Superintendent John Meighan said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me