ShareThis Page

Couple, children escape Kiski Township blaze that damages house

| Monday, March 8, 2010

The state police fire marshal will investigate the cause of a fire that damaged a house along Route 56 on Sunday.

No one was hurt.

Township Fire Chief Rich Frain said the fire started at 1:14 p.m. in the 1700 block in Kiski Township's Spring Church section, about four miles north of Apollo.

Frain said Patrick Norris and Christina Davila rented the house and lived there with two children, ages 8 and 10. Frain said Davila and the two children were home when the fire started.

"She just said she saw smoke and got everybody out of the house," Frain said. "She said she saw smoke coming down from the upstairs.We have no idea what caused it."

He said the fire apparently started in the master bedroom on the second floor which was gutted. He said the house sustained moderate damage with most of the first floor damaged by smoke and water..

"I don't know if it will be salvageable or not," he said. I guess that will be up to the insurance company to determine," Frain said. "I'd say pretty much all their furnishings and clothing are gone."

He said David Klingensmith of Spring Church owns the two-story wood-frame house. Frain said the tenants did not have renters insurance but Klingensmith had insurance.

Frain said about 40 firefighters from Kiski Township, North Apollo and Oklahoma fire departments responded, with Apollo on standby. He said they were on the scene about three hours.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me