ShareThis Page
News

Akins gives Apollo-Ridge win over Ellwood City

| Saturday, Sept. 6, 2003

APOLLO: The Apollo-Ridge Vikings avoided going into section play with a losing mark Friday with the help from their sophmore kicker, Brianna Akins.

After a Jeff Zelonka spike to stop the clock, senior fullback Jarrod Miller scored from 3 yards out with leaving 2 seconds left to play and no timeouts to tie the Ellwood City Wolverines (1-1) at 20. With the Apollo-Ridge faithful on their feet, the 5-foot-5 Akins stepped out onto the field and, like a seasoned veteran, kicked perhaps the most important kick in her short football career.

"She's pretty consistent; she works hard at it; and she's had a bad knee too," Apollo- Ridge head coach Jerry Moore said, "Actually my father (Bill Moore) works a lot with her in her kicking."

After a sluggish first half that ended with the score at 6, the teams came out in the second half primed to attack their opponent's weaknesses. Apollo-Ridge's first possession of the second half started with 9:32 left in the third quarter and 90 yards and 11 minutes later, Miller punched the ball in the end zone to take a14-6 lead.

Ellwood City's character was put to the test as they came back with two scoring drives of its own to take the lead, 20-14, and quiet the Viking crowd. Trailing by six with 2 minutes remaining, junior quarterback Zelonka's 35- yard pass to fellow junior Chris Stewart got the wheels turning and the fire burning under the hood of Viking fullback Miller as he led the charge and rolled over the Wolverine defense.

"(Miller's) one of those kids who just takes things on his shoulders. I told him, 'Jarrod you're the man,' and he just stepped up." Moore said.

And like a scene from a Hollywood movie, Akins delivered the game winner with no time left.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me