ShareThis Page
News

Plum continues hot start under first-year coach

| Sunday, April 10, 2005

PLUM -- Senior infielder Mike McKee's two-out single in the bottom of the fifth inning Saturday scored Brian Churilla with the go-ahead run as Plum defeated Hempfield, 5-4, in a nonsection game to continue its strong start under first-year coach Carl Vollmer.

Plum improved to 5-0 as senior outfielder Phil Mains and senior second baseman Steve Beckett each had two hits. Mains doubled, and Beckett tripled to back a solid effort by five Mustang pitchers.

Andy Harris pitched a scoreless fifth to pick up the win, but starter Scott Kachurik, Mike Cable, Ryan Webb and Scott McGough also contributed on the mound. McGough, a freshman, picked up his third save, after a scoreless seventh.

Those pitchers held Hempfield to six hits.

"Our relief pitching has been exceptional," Vollmer said. "We've been able to get leads and hold on.

"I think the nice thing is that we've outhit opponents and outpitched them. I think that shows that we can win games in a variety of ways."

Plum, which is 1-0 in Section 4-AAAA, resumes section play Monday against Franklin Regional.

Nonsection

  • Valley 12, The Kiski School 9 -- At The Kiski School, Joe Fantuzzo went 3 for 3, including a two-run double, and pitcher Frank Sharrock (1-0) picked up the win for the Vikings (1-0, 3-2).

    Casey Jackson also doubled, and Tom Wyant tripled for Valley, which has won two straight.

    Sharrock, who also had a two-base hit, pitched two innings.

    Valley, which led 7-0, had 10 hits after posting just 15 in its first four games.

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

    click me