ShareThis Page
News

Fox Chapel girls hope for reversal

| Sunday, Nov. 18, 2007

O'HARA -- The Fox Chapel girls basketball team appeared to be off to a decent 3-4 overall start last season. Then, fourth-year letter-winner Caitlyn Kriston was injured and the Foxes' fortunes soon sagged since Kriston was the keystone of the lineup.

Fox Chapel was competitive in a number of games, but inexperience ultimately showed and the Foxes finished with a 3-9 section record, 6-18 overall. Nine of the losses were by 10 points or fewer, including a trio of two-point setbacks.

"I would consider us having made very big strides over the spring, summer and into the fall," said seventh-year coach Jeremy Bennett. "I think we indoctrinated a lot of kids into the fire last year earlier than they had expected. I just don't know if they really had the full maturity and understanding of how to finish and compete for the whole time."

Bennett feels the offseason program was the most successful in at least four years and the fact that eight letter-winners return is cause for optimism.

Last year, Fox Chapel was a guard-oriented team. This season, the strength should be in the frontcourt with Jenny Papich, Heidi Goeller and Holly Borquin returning.

"Those girls got a lot out of last year and they have really increased that ability," Bennett said. "We hope that takes a lot of pressure off our guards, frees them up more, and we can play a little more inside-out and have a focus on our inside presence."

The Foxes will have a link to a successful part of the past this season as Teresa Kubala Thompson, a key player in the '90s, is now an assistant to Bennett.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me