ShareThis Page
News

Consistency's the goal for Knoch girls

Bill Beckner Jr.
| Friday, Dec. 3, 2010

Sean O'Donnell knows it's going to take some time to build consistency at Knoch.

After all, he is the girls basketball team's third coach in three years.

"No matter how you try to keep things the same, you're also changing things," said O'Donnell, a St. Joseph graduate. "A lot of these girls had a different ninth-grade coach, too. It's going to be a challenge for me and the girls."

Knoch was 7-13 last season and must replace a talented player in Hannah Novotny, who is now at Penn State Behrend. Senior guard Taylor Zonts received the most playing time last season and will be a vital part of the offense.

It appears Zonts will be joined in the lineup by junior guard Katie Miller, senior guard-forward Haley Williams, senior forward Heather Cooper (5-foot-11) and sophomore guard Sam Logan (5-9).

Knoch averaged just 36.6 points last season, but O'Donnell is stressing defensive fundamentals.

"I know one thing," he said. "We're going to play good, hard defense. And I am going to coach to the ability of my players."

Three important reserves are junior guard Rachel Neff, junior guard-forward Amber Henzel (5-9) and junior guard-forward Brooke Armahizer. Rising 5-8 freshman guard Celina Sanks also could get some minutes.

Knoch made the playoffs two years ago in Curt Vasas' last year with the team. O'Donnell replaced Rob Greenleaf, who is now the boys coach at Ford City. O'Donnell coached the junior high boys team at Knoch and has never coached girls.

He sought guidance from his former coach, Kelly Robinson; the boys coach at St. Joseph, Robinson used to coach the Highlands girls.

"We've been talking a lot," O'Donnell said. "It's definitely different coaching girls. It's a different mentality."

Knoch opens Dec. 10 against Aliquippa in the Springdale tournament.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me