ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Braddock council postpones vote to appoint interim mayor

Jamie Martines
| Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2019, 10:09 p.m.
Braddock Council delayed a vote to appoint a replacement for outgoing Mayor John Fetterman, who will become the state’s lieutenant governor next week.
Braddock Council delayed a vote to appoint a replacement for outgoing Mayor John Fetterman, who will become the state’s lieutenant governor next week.
Braddock Councilman Robert Clanagan, left, and council President Tina Doose, right, during the council meeting on Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2019.
Braddock Councilman Robert Clanagan, left, and council President Tina Doose, right, during the council meeting on Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2019.

Following a heated public comment period, Braddock Council voted Tuesday to delay the scheduled appointment of an interim mayor.

“There was so much controversy from the residents, I couldn’t see us in good conscience going through with the process,” Councilman Robert Clanagan, who made the initial motion to postpone the vote, said following the meeting.

Residents questioned the application process and whether candidates were qualified to fill the position of mayor.

Council unanimously voted to accept the resignation of outgoing Mayor John Fetterman, who will be sworn in as lieutenant governor next week.

Fetterman did not attend the council meeting Tuesday.

The six-member council now has 30 days to appoint an interim mayor, borough Solicitor Pete Halesey said following the meeting.

Prior to voting to accept Fetterman’s resignation, council was not obligated to initiate a process to replace the mayor, he said.

There is no set process for appointing a new mayor, he added.

If council does not appoint a replacement within 30 days, a vacancy board comprised of the six council members plus a seventh individual will have 15 days to appoint a replacement, Halesey said.

If the vacancy board does not come up with a replacement, the appointment will be made by Allegheny County Court, Halesey said.

Whoever eventually is appointed would have to run for election this year to keep the seat.

Council had planned to vote Tuesday between candidates Isaac Bunn and Pedro Valles. Some residents questioned Bunn’s residency qualifications, saying he is registered to vote in nearby North Braddock.

Bunn, 49, is a 1988 graduate of Woodland Hills High School with certificates in cooking, restaurant and business management from Forbes Road East Career and Technical School in Monroeville, he told the Tribune-Review in December.

He has worked in corporate financial, food service and management fields for about 30 years and runs the Braddock-based nonprofit Braddock Inclusion Project, which was founded in 2015 to improve the quality of life, health and economic conditions for residents of the borough, he said.

Valles, 53, moved to the Pittsburgh area in 1995 and has since settled in Braddock, he told the Tribune-Review in December. He’s an officer with the Rankin Police Department and is assigned as a school resource officer at the Rankin Promise School in the Woodland Hills School District.

He previously served as a police officer in Braddock and was elected constable for Braddock’s second ward. Some residents questioned Tuesday whether Valles could legally serve as both a state constable and mayor at the same time.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, jmartines@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Jamie_Martines.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me