In state Superior Court race, four candidates vie for two open seats |

In state Superior Court race, four candidates vie for two open seats

Megan Guza
Candidate for Pennsylvania’s Superior Court, clockwise from top left: Megan McCarthy King, Judge Daniel McCaffery, Judge Christylee Peck, Amanda Green-Hawkins

Four candidates are running for two open seats on Pennsylvania’s Superior Court, one of the state’s two intermediate appellate courts.

The Superior Court hears all appeals from the Court of Common Pleas and is made up of 15 judges. Appeals are generally heard by a three-judge panel. Only one candidate, Amanda Green-Hawkins, is from Western Pennsylvania. Megan McCarthy King graduated from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.

Amanda Green-Hawkins (Democrat)

Current: Associate counsel for the United Steelworkers

Former: Allegheny County Councilwoman

Hawkins attended Duke University followed by Northeastern University School of Law, where she graduated in 2001, according to her answers to a questionnaire from the Pennsylvania Bar Association. She spent the next year as a clerk for New Jersey Superior Court Judge Lawrence Lawson.

She represented the Steelworkers union in civil litigation in federal courts, filing pleadings and motions, writing briefs and appearing for oral arguments, according to her Pennsylvania Bar answers. Since 2010, she has advised the union of employment matters related to discrimination and harassment.

“My law practice, which has focused on appellate work, suits me for the Pennsylvania Superior Court, which I am convinced is the next natural step in my career,” Hawkins wrote.

Judge Daniel McCaffery (Democrat)

Current: Trial judge, Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas

Former: Philadelphia Assistant District Attorney, managing partner at Friedman Schuman

The son of Irish immigrants, McCaffery joined the military right out of high school and was selected to attend the Military Academy at West Point Prep School. He attended Temple University and the university’s law school on veterans’ scholarships.

He said the appellate court’s role is to examine potential errors made by the trial court.

“Who better to know what those errors were … than a trial judge?” he said. “I think it’s important that trial judges seek appellate positions, and I think it’s important that people with experience and proven track records of success in courtrooms try to become involved in public service.”

Judge Christylee Peck (Republican)

Current: Judge, Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas

Former: Senior Assistant District Attorney, Cumberland County; Assistant District Attorney, Lancaster County

Peck received her law degree from Penn State’s Dickinson School of Law and began her career at a private law firm in Harrisburg, according to her answers to a questionnaire from the Pennsylvania Bar Association.

In the Lancaster District Attorney’s Office, her focus was on prosecuting crimes against children before she returned to her home county of Cumberland to work in the District Attorney’s Office there.

She wrote that she wants to “serve the public in a broader capacity” and bring her trial judge and prosecutorial experience to the appellate court.

Megan McCarthy King (Republican)

Current: Deputy District Attorney, Child Abuse Unit, Chester County

Former: Assistant District Attorney, Lancaster County

King grew up in Delaware County and attended Vanderbilt University and the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. She began her career in the Lancaster County District Attorney’s Office prosecuting child abuse cases, later taking on elder abuse as well.

She clerked for state Supreme Court Justice Thomas Saylor and later became a certified special education teacher to better serve the children in her cases.

King said she thinks it’s important to note that she has current prosecutorial experience.

“I loved my opportunity to clerk for (Saylor), and I learned the responsibility of being an appellate judge is to follow the Constitution and rule of law,” she said. “Let the law be your guide, as opposed to bending the law for a desired outcome.”

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.