UPMC: Visitor brought in bacteria to Children’s Hospital ICU | TribLIVE.com

UPMC: Visitor brought in bacteria to Children’s Hospital ICU

Megan Guza
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh on Tuesday, July 2, 2019.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh on Tuesday, July 2, 2019.
Megan Guza | Tribune-Review
Diane Hupp, chief nursing officer at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, and Dr. Kristen Mertz of the Allegheny County Health Department speak about an outbreak of MRSA affecting six infants and six staff members in the neonatal intensive care unit on Tuesday, July 2, 2019.

A visitor to the neonatal intensive care unit at UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh is believed to have brought in the antibiotic-resistant staph bacteria that spread to six babies and six staff members, a hospital official said Tuesday.

The hospital began testing the NICU infants and staff Thursday afternoon after someone came forward and “gave us reason to initiate the testing,” said Diane Hupp, the hospital’s chief nursing officer.

She declined to explain further.

None of the infants who tested positive for the bacteria — called MRSA, or methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus — has shown symptoms of infection, Hupp said.

Hospital officials on Monday announced that six infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and six hospital employees tested positive for MRSA, a type of staph bacteria that’s resistant to many of the antibiotics used to treat ordinary staph infections.

“All of the babies are stable, and none of those babies are demonstrating signs or symptoms of any type of infection,” Hupp said.

One infant was being treated out of an abundance of caution, she said.

One-third of people carry staph bacteria in their nose or on their skin, and about 2 in 100 will have MRSA without showing symptoms, said Dr. Kristen Mertz of the Allegheny County Health Department.

“Occasionally, you go on to develop infection,” she said.

In this instance, the infants tested positive for the bacteria, called colonization, but they do not have any classic signs of infection.

A skin infection is the most common type of infection caused by MRSA, Mertz said. That generally presents as a red, tender area on the skin that eventually develops pus, she said.

Most neonatal units test infants for MRSA when they come into the unit.

“A percentage of them are positive when they come in, so there’s almost always babies who are colonized with MRSA in the NICU,” she said. “The challenge is to keep it from spreading to other infants and to prevent it from becoming an active infection.”

Infants in the neonatal unit who might already have compromised health are particularly susceptible to infection, said Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and a Pittsburgh-based infectious disease physician.

“Anytime there is an outbreak or a cluster of infections involving neonates, the concern is heightened as those patients have less reserve to fight off infections and colonization,” he said.

Hupp declined to say whether any of the six positive staff members showed symptoms of infection. All infants and staff in the NICU have since been tested for the bacteria. Several tests, Hupp said, remain pending.

The infants who tested positive have been put in contact isolation — anyone in contact with them must wear gloves and gowns, and visitors have been limited to parents or guardians, Hupp said. The staff members who tested positive are off work until they test negative.

Mertz said MRSA is treatable and preventable, mainly through hand-washing and keeping open wounds covered.

“I think the hysteria has gone down a little about MRSA,” she said. “There’s a lot more that we know about it — it’s common, it’s treatable, we know basic ways to prevent it.”

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.