Editorials

Editorial: Courthouse turnover shouldn’t delay critical cases

Tribune-Review
By Tribune-Review
2 Min Read March 1, 2026 | 2 hours ago
Go Ad-Free today

A capital case in Allegheny County may be delayed because another prosecutor assigned to it is leaving the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Berosh said during a status conference Monday that she was leaving the prosecutor’s office. She was not the first. Her departure makes her the fourth prosecutor to cycle through Johnathan Morris’s case for the 2023 shooting of McKeesport police Officer Sean Sluganski.

The underlying charges are grave. The courtroom will sort the facts. A judge will rule. A jury will decide.

But one principle stands outside any single defendant: Personnel instability should never become a roadblock to justice.

Lawyers are not interchangeable parts, especially in complex and high-stakes cases. They absorb thousands of pages of evidence. They prepare witnesses. They navigate motions and evidentiary fights. They build continuity over months and years.

A trial is not just the place where prosecution and defense come together. It’s the culmination of a process. When turnover interrupts that process, the consequences ripple outward.

Cases that involve the death of a police officer generally are seen as priorities. Every officer is, in a sense, a brother or sister to the victim. That carries weight in a courthouse. It is felt in the prosecutor’s office. It is felt in the fact that the victim’s job is one factor that makes capital punishment a possibility.

If a case with that kind of visibility and urgency is strained by personnel turnover, what is happening in the quieter courtrooms?

What about the families who are not omnipresent in the courthouse? The victims whose names are barely known?

A prosecutor’s office is an institution. It must function beyond the tenure of any one assistant district attorney. Leadership must plan for departures — and work to avoid them. Workload must reflect the reality of the caseload. Retention must be addressed before it becomes disruption.

These are not partisan issues. They are operational ones.

Public confidence in the justice system depends not just on verdicts but also on stability that is seen in fluid function. Deliberation is built into the courts. Disruption should not be.

Justice is not something that can be backlogged. It must be accomplished in a timely matter, day in and day out.

It should not hinge on who has turned in a resignation letter.

Share

Categories:

Tags:

About the Writers

Push Notifications

Get news alerts first, right in your browser.

Enable Notifications

Content you may have missed

Enjoy TribLIVE, Uninterrupted.

Support our journalism and get an ad-free experience on all your devices.

  • TribLIVE AdFree Monthly

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Pay just $4.99 for your first month
  • TribLIVE AdFree Annually BEST VALUE

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Billed annually, $49.99 for the first year
    • Save 50% on your first year
Get Ad-Free Access Now View other subscription options