ShareThis Page
Editorials

Editorial: Is Wolf's budget feasible?

| Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2019, 1:42 p.m.
Gov. Tom Wolf on Tuesday delivers his budget address for the 2019-20 fiscal year to a joint session of the Pennsylvania House and Senate in Harrisburg. House Speaker Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny,is left and Lt. Gov. John Fetterman is right.
Gov. Tom Wolf on Tuesday delivers his budget address for the 2019-20 fiscal year to a joint session of the Pennsylvania House and Senate in Harrisburg. House Speaker Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny,is left and Lt. Gov. John Fetterman is right.

Wow, does Gov. Tom Wolf’s budget sound good.

He started out his 2019-20 budget address — a kind of “State of the Commonwealth” — with what he acknowledged was the thing people really wanted to know.

“This proposal asks for no new taxes. Not one dollar. Not one dime. Not one penny,” he said.

Having promised cake, he then pulled out ice cream.

In addition to letting Pennsylvanians keep their wallets closed, or at least not opened any further, the governor has big plans for areas that have been important since his first campaign. Once again, he wants to focus on education and economy.

His budget had big ideas in those areas. A Statewide Workforce, Education and Accountability Program would bundle those critical areas.

“Starting immediately, we are going to put together a Keystone Economic Development and Workforce Command Center,” Wolf said.

That would include a “first-of-its-kind Employer Fund” to bring public agencies and the private sector together to find ways to fill skills gaps.

The budget also includes steps to improve child care and build on previous education funding. Wolf would lower the age kids have to be in school from 8 years old to 6. Every kindergarten classroom would be full-day. Students no longer would be able to drop out at 16 but be required to stay in school until 18.

And the starting salary for teachers would have a $45,000 ground floor, fully funded by the state.

So would a grant program for community college graduates who put those degrees to work in Pennsylvania, and a program for parents to improve their employability to support their kids, and a $10 million infusion for PAsmart.gov to “fill more advanced manufacturing positions, help more nontraditional students … and create more jobs at better wages.”

Oh, and a Pennsylvanian version of the GI Bill that would help veterans and their kids with education and training.

It all sounds great.

But with no tax increase, is it feasible? Is it even likely? Pennsylvania’s state government has had standoffs over budgets that turned into cage matches. Pennsylvania can look at the recent federal government shutdown, chuckle and say “That was cute. Nice try.”

“In the coming weeks, we’ll have the chance to discuss, debate and negotiate the details,” Wolf said.

That’s where things always get sticky.

Hopefully the governor and the Legislature, the Democrats and the Republicans will be able to do in Harrisburg what they are having trouble doing in Washington. Maybe they can have real negotiations, genuine debate and come up with a solution that keeps the promise of Wolf’s proposal. Maybe we can have the cake and the ice cream.

But history tells us there’s going to be spinach in there somewhere.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me