ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

David Argall: Road map to safer schools

| Saturday, Jan. 12, 2019, 7:03 p.m.
High school students in Dearborn, Mich., participate in a nationwide walkout to bring attention to and honor the 17 students killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
High school students in Dearborn, Mich., participate in a nationwide walkout to bring attention to and honor the 17 students killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

Citizens throughout the country watched in horror last year as a gunman claimed the lives of 17 students in a shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla. People were heartbroken to see yet another school shooting taking the lives of the innocent. In the midst of this tragedy, our Senate Majority Policy Committee set out to find solutions to provide a safer environment for our students.

We held 10 public roundtable sessions across the state. Discussions held during hearings were centered on two goals: reviewing recently enacted laws, and soliciting input and feedback for existing and new proposals to make our schools safer in Pennsylvania.

Each event we held was broken into three main parts: discussion of recently passed laws, discussion of pending proposals before the state Legislature, and new ideas for the General Assembly to consider.

Participants varied for each roundtable discussion and were based on the local needs and issues of the host community. Events featured officials from the state, local and school levels, safety experts, law professionals and students.

Key findings and points of discussion from the sessions were compiled into a 16-page report, which is available at www.senator argall.com (video of each roundtable discussion is also available).

Two main recommendations grew out of these hearings: a focus on mental health, and the ability to harden targets.

In the end, there was a complete understanding of the importance and the need for school resource officers (SROs). School administrators, students and legislators agreed that SROs were the best deterrent against school violence and one of the most important investments schools can make to address safety.

These hearings came during the most significant bipartisan investment in school safety in the history of our commonwealth. Last year, the General Assembly and the governor — each branch led by a different political party — agreed to invest a record $60 million in funds to provide school safety initiatives for the 2018-19 state budget.

We have an obligation, a duty to protect our children and our educators and staff in school. This report is the result of a bipartisan effort where state officials, safety experts and concerned citizens and school officials could come together and talk about an issue that is never easy to address.

These kinds of tragedies must be prevented at all costs. I look forward to continuing this work in the next legislative session, and I look forward to working with all participants, public and private, House and Senate, Republican and Democrat, to continue finding solutions to ensure our students’ safety.

Republican State Sen. David Argall represents Schuylkill and Berks counties.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me