Letters (Westmoreland)

Letter to the editor: ‘Context’ and book challenges

Tribune-Review
By Tribune-Review
1 Min Read Jan. 30, 2023 | 3 years Ago
Go Ad-Free today

Regarding the editorial “Does Norwin director’s book challenge require more context?” (Jan. 18, TribLIVE): Talk about the liberal Trib calling the kettle black! They are attacking the messenger, not the message. Only conservatives require “context.” It’s quite OK for liberals to rewrite the meaning of words or history, even though the events of our past had different meanings, but context doesn’t matter in those cases. The context by which the tearing down of our statues or flags occurred is because those doing so failed history class in school or were not taught. The truth of our history requires no context. It is what it is.

But, I digress. Alex Detschelt was simply pointing out the concerns of parents who reached out to him. He is their voice. And might I add that your criticism of him and his prior usage of the word “retard” was taken way out of context. Liberals can’t justify their context without distorting facts, rewriting history or character assassination. Such as your editorial.

Rich Walczak

North Huntingdon

Share

Tags:

About the Writers

Push Notifications

Get news alerts first, right in your browser.

Enable Notifications

Content you may have missed

Enjoy TribLIVE, Uninterrupted.

Support our journalism and get an ad-free experience on all your devices.

  • TribLIVE AdFree Monthly

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Pay just $4.99 for your first month
  • TribLIVE AdFree Annually BEST VALUE

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Billed annually, $49.99 for the first year
    • Save 50% on your first year
Get Ad-Free Access Now View other subscription options