Letters (Westmoreland)

Letter to the editor: Plum injection well problems

Tribune-Review
By Tribune-Review
1 Min Read July 12, 2022 | 3 years Ago
Go Ad-Free today

The EPA held a virtual hearing June 28 for the proposed Penneco Environmental Solutions Sedat 4A injection well in Plum Borough for storing fracking waste, which contains poisonous chemicals and radioactivity. An existing gas well would be converted into this injection well.

This existing gas well was not originally designed to be an injection well. This is a poor engineering practice. The objectors are quite correct about the fact that an injection well will have high-pressure cyclic stress (fatigue). Those pressure cycles could very well lead to waste leaks from steel casing failure. My materials science class manual from circa 1990 states that “A metal subjected to repetitive or fluctuating stress (fatigue) will fail at a stress much lower than that required to cause fracture on a single application of load.”

Complaints from nearby residents about tainted well and spring water since the sister Sedat 3A injection well (former gas well) began operating in late spring 2021 were reported in the article “2nd injection well project in Plum faces opposition from residents, borough officials” (Dec. 10, TribLIVE). Leaking injection wells in Plum could contaminate the Allegheny River and harm water supplies.

Larry Irr

Trafford

Share

Tags:

About the Writers

Push Notifications

Get news alerts first, right in your browser.

Enable Notifications

Content you may have missed

Enjoy TribLIVE, Uninterrupted.

Support our journalism and get an ad-free experience on all your devices.

  • TribLIVE AdFree Monthly

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Pay just $4.99 for your first month
  • TribLIVE AdFree Annually BEST VALUE

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Billed annually, $49.99 for the first year
    • Save 50% on your first year
Get Ad-Free Access Now View other subscription options