Pennsylvania’s system to fund public education is inherently flawed, perpetuating disparities among communities and their constituents, most negatively impacting the youngest. Because property taxes factor so heavily into school budgets, it pushes the weight of responsibility onto the shoulders of those who have children attending school, but also those who do not. Unfortunately, this may foster antagonism among taxpayers, school advocates and elected officials.
Nonetheless, the 8-1 decision by the Greensburg Salem School Board signaling intent to eliminate three elementary school library positions is an irresponsible choice (“Greensburg Salem mulls cutting librarians,” May 1, TribLIVE). Removing the very people who can help foster a love of reading and learning at a crucial time of intellectual and behavioral development will have long-standing negative repercussions as those elementary school students progress through their schooling and beyond. Well-educated children become well-educated adults who live, work and invest in the communities from which they matriculated.
This likely decision, made to save $211,383 — at a district compelled to settle a discrimination suit for $225,000 only last year — in my opinion is evidence of poor management and misguided leadership that only exacerbates any economic challenges the district may face.
Strong schools benefit all members of a community, whether they have children attending or not. Strong schools can increase property value and limit attrition, to the advantage of all citizens.
However, no school can overcome a deficit in leadership and poor fiscal management, and no community can thrive under the shadow of an atrophying district. We will all suffer the consequences, as will our children.
Ashley Washburn
Salem