ShareThis Page
Penguins

In battle of traded players, Penguins' Jared McCann gets goal, but Florida gets win

Jonathan Bombulie
| Friday, Feb. 8, 2019, 5:36 a.m.
Florida Panthers center Derick Brassard (25) skates with the puck as Pittsburgh Penguins defenseman Jack Johnson (73) defends during the second period of an NHL hockey game, Thursday, Feb. 7, 2019, in Sunrise, Fla.
Florida Panthers center Derick Brassard (25) skates with the puck as Pittsburgh Penguins defenseman Jack Johnson (73) defends during the second period of an NHL hockey game, Thursday, Feb. 7, 2019, in Sunrise, Fla.

There was a fairly obvious game within a game being played when the Pittsburgh Penguins faced the Florida Panthers on Thursday night.

It was a matchup of four players who had just been traded for one another last week.

Jared McCann got the goal, but Derick Brassard and Riley Sheahan got the win as the Panthers beat the Penguins, 3-2 in overtime.

“Got the monkey off the back, which was nice, but I would trade that in for a win any day,” McCann said.

McCann’s goal – the first for either he or Nick Bjugstad since last Friday’s trade – came shorthanded in the second period. He kept the puck himself on the right wing on a two-on-one with Bryan Rust and beat goalie Roberto Luongo with a shot inside the far post.

“I thought he had a strong game,” coach Mike Sullivan said. “He can really skate. He was really good on the penalty kill. He gets a huge goal for us shorthanded. I thought his line was better five-on-five tonight. I think he’s getting more comfortable with how we’re trying to play. He’s getting better with each game.”

Brassard was caught flat-footed in the neutral zone, allowing the two-on-one break to happen in the first place. He was also on the ice for Marcus Pettersson’s goal in the third period, finishing with a minus-2 rating in about 19 minutes of ice time.

He had the second assist on Evgenii Dadonov’s first-period goal.

Sheahan, meanwhile, could have easily joined McCann in the goal column had a controversial call not gone against him in the first two minutes of the game.

Goalie Casey DeSmith couldn’t handle a point-blank Sheahan shot, and as the rebound caromed around underneath the goalie, the former Penguins center jammed it across the goal line.

Referee Eric Furlatt waved the goal off, ruling that Sheahan had illegally pushed DeSmith’s pads and the puck into the cage.

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me