For years, Pennsylvanians have been making the argument to Harrisburg that the state needs a gift ban. It needs a firm, unimpeachable prohibition against anyone who wants something wrapping it up in pretty paper, smacking a bow on top and pretending it’s not an attempt to purchase favor.
It’s an argument that has been made on the steps of the state Capitol. It has been made in writing. Just last week it was made outside state Sen. Joe Pittman’s New Kensington office.
Nothing happens. Nothing ever happens.
The most progress a gift ban makes is being introduced by a lawmaker and, twice, making it through committee in the House. It then starves for lack of attention before coming to a full vote.
Oh, the irony. If that bill were an elected official, a lobbyist could buy it dinner.
Instead of continuing to press the case for simple ethics — not accepting gifts like the General Assembly is a wedding reception for hundreds of blushing brides — let’s turn the tables.
Let’s ask our legislators to defend the practice.
Despite years of appeals, lawmakers generally are sympathetic when nodding and agreeing that, yes, a gift ban is a good idea. It’s just a good idea that Pennsylvanians have begged for but never receive.
It’s not a partisan issue, either. It’s an equal opportunity failure. There’s no one else to blame.
So let us offer an opportunity to the 253 people who write and vote on the laws that govern Pennsylvania. Explain why a gift ban is a bad idea.
Explain why there should not be a legal hurdle preventing you from traveling on the dime of a company that wants something from government. Explain why you should be able to accept hundreds of dollars worth of meals. Explain why you should get to open that company’s gifts.
Make the case.
If you can’t, don’t let Pennsylvanians put a gift ban on their wish list while you ignore it like a shopping mall Santa. Write it, pass it and tie it with a bow. No receipt is necessary. It won’t be returned.
