State-owned schools seek 4% rise in funds
Pennsylvania's state-owned universities are seeking a 4 percent budget increase for 2014-15, to end four years of austerity budgets.
The board that oversees the 14-member State System of Higher Education system on Thursday agreed to ask for an extra $16.5 million in state subsidies, as well as a special onetime allocation of $18 million for new programs and the expansion of others.
“We are retooling our universities to meet changing student demographics (and) new workforce demands,” said Guido M. Pichini, board chairman.
Four years ago, lawmakers slashed subsidies to the schools by 18 percent and followed up with three more years of no increases.
State Rep. Jim Christiana, chairman of the state House Subcommittee on Higher Education, said he's sympathetic to the system's needs.
“We're all hoping that the economy will keep growing and we will be able to make increased investments in higher education. Their request for an increase in operating funds is reasonable,” said Christiana, a Beaver County Republican.
He was not as optimistic about the request for the additional $18 million the universities say they need to realign with a changing economy.
“With new programs, it's always a case of which comes first, the chicken or the egg. They want to start a program, and we want to see results,” Christiana said.
The state system, which includes Indiana, Clarion, Slippery Rock, California and Edinboro universities in Western Pennsylvania, has an enrollment of about 112,000 students.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.